[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Re: Fwd: [office] proposal to enhance annotations
adding the main TC list to the cc ... Florian Reuter wrote: > Hmm. Looks like a perfect use-case for metadata. > And especially a lot of time went into the dicussion of ids and overlapping start/end segments. > > So I see no reason why introducing yet another extension mechanism. > > At least the proposal should be compatible with the metadata spec and not orthogonal. Absolutely! I'm fine with the notion that defining an annotation region is different than a bookmark, and I agree that one should be able to define annotation regions in ODF. But beyond that, one could imagine some messy overlap with metadata. E.g. a "compatible" proposal, to me, would be: 1) structurally equivalent to bookmarks 2) allow xml:id 3) use RDF for any optional metadata (creator, date, subjects, etc.). So what does the annotation XML actually look like? Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]