[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-metadata] Re: [office] proposal to enhanceannotations
Hmm. So you would suggest to Oliver to use line-breaks instead of paragraphs. Sure --- he didn't have to enhance annotations then ;-) Anway --- that was not the reason we dropped start/end tags. ~Florian >>> Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> 07/27/07 1:14 AM >>> Florian Reuter wrote: > I proposed to enhance fields by having a start-field and end-field > for --- you guess --- OOXML interop :-) You can simply take Olivers > proposal and replace annotations whith fields you have the proposal I > made. > > The SC convinced me that using -start/-end tags is not a good thing. > I don't recall all the arguments but maybe the experts can just jump > in and recall the arguments. I guess the most prominent ones where: * > Bad for validation * Bad for XSL(T) :-) * (there where more... / > maybe one of the SC experts can provide them?) It's been awhile, but I think you were saying that the primary use case you were relying on was where field content might have line-breaks. I think we just suggested using the line-breaks, then, rather than paragraphs. As I said, though, it's a little fuzzy now. For reference, the problem with these sorts of regions is that overlapping markup and potential well-formedness problems. This is why the start/end approach. > The solution offered by the SC (for me) was to use bookmarks --- > which I successfully did: > http://florianreuter.blogspot.com/2007/07/field-enhancement-proof-of-concept.html Cool. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]