Re: [office] Proposal for modification of preview image description

[Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>]

Patrick Durusau wrote:

>> I don't know. A user shouldn't care how the preview is stored, even
>> if they might want to choose the size at which it's displayed. I
>> don't think you want a situation where one implementation does
>> 32x32 and another does 256x256?
>> 
> Sorry, why would that be a problem?

If a 32x32 image gets scaled to 256x256 it looks really bad?

> Any image support is going to  support images of varying sizes
> anyway. What do we gain by setting a size?

I don't have a super strong opinion on this, but it seems to me the
preview ought not be too small. So maybe not setting a precise size, but 
  at least a minimum, or a suggested size?

Bruce