[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Proposal for modification of preview image description
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 20:55:42 Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > Thomas -- you might read the document that Florian linked to before > jumping on him. I took his email to reply to, I could have taken any email. My point was that there is a proposal where the only reason I have seen so far is that some (unnamed) operating system might not work with it. I was requesting more info. > It recommends using 128x128 or 256x256. Are you saying > we can't allow 256x256? In vain of the classic mistake of "640kb should be enough for everyone" I have no problems with changing the spec to requiring a minimum of 128x128 so an implementation can write a 256x256 image or even bigger. I think the rest of the original text still makes sense, and I'd like to see the concrete problems faced on which the proposal was based. -- Thomas Zander
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]