[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: compact syntax
Lars Oppermann wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Apropos compact syntax... Although I am currently not really fluent at > it - because we use the xml syntax in our spec - It may actually be > worth considering migrating the spec to use the compact syntax, as it is > indeed much more palatable. I don't think that this would impact our > nice automatic extraction process, which allows us to have a common > document for the schema and the specification text. After all, > converting between the two representations is an isomorphism. > > What do others think about this? Lars -- this raises a related question. If we favor easy-to-read compact syntaxes for the spec, does that mean we can/should use N3 rather than RDF/XML for the OWL fragments we include in ODF 1.2? Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]