Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compactsyntax

[Michael Brauer <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

Hi Patrick,

well, I think what we can do in addition to your suggestion is to 
provide a compact schema with new drafts that we upload. This would 
allow us to get some experience with them before we actually replace 
anything in the schema itself, which would be a step that actually is 
difficult to revert is something goes wrong.

Michael



Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Bruce,
> 
> Actually I asked Svante about this and he suggested:
> 
> Relax -> compact Relax, followed by:
> 
> compact Relax -> Relax^1, followed by:
> 
> diff on Relax and Relax^1.
> 
> I would add some spot checking on some of the more complex 
> constructions, say about 5% of the total. Just as a sanity check.
> 
> Hope you are having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 
> Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> Dave Pawson wrote:
>>> On 15/08/07, robert_weir@us.ibm.com <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and 
>>>> will not
>>>> introduce any errors?
>>> The author of Trang believes this is not true.
>>
>> An awkward sentence construction: what's the referent "this"?
>>
>> From the rest of your message, it sound like it is "that conversion is 
>> not perfect" (e.g. a double-negative), which would mean we can be safe 
>> assuming it is "perfect"?
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
        D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering