[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] feature request for enhanced OOo input fields: somesuggestions for discussion
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems wrote: > I've got the action item to follow up this issue on the mailing list. > Thus, I want again ask for preferences or objections for the variants. My main points were: a) wanted some clarification of (different) generic fields (to see how the new metadata field fits in, or not, and to in general clarify field semantics) b) to express a general preference to prefer well-formedness to ease XML processing (for example, XSLT) c) that I thought Florian's work on OOo was cool that I'd love to see it help towards implementation of the new metadata field I already indicated my general preference on the list (I think it was for 4b IIRC). See also my back-and-forth with Mathias on his recent blog entry. <http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/custom_properties_and_fields> I may have something more to say soon about implementation ideas for custom metadata and fields soon. Bruce
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]