Re: [office] form:datasource

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Rob,

robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
> Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> wrote on 04/30/2008 08:03:37 AM:
>
> > Greetings!
> >
> > I don't know where else to write this down but we should note that
> > form:datasource should be form:data-source to be consistent with our
> > naming practice.
> >
>
> That is a good question, where else should this be written down?   Are 
> you keeping a list of the discrepancies that you've found?  In some 
> cases these are good candidates for ODF 1.0 errata as well.  I want to 
> make sure that we're not losing any observations in the overall 
> traffic of the list.
>
> Maybe you could place these observations (just cut and paste) into a 
> Wiki page?  Then we'll have a running record of the open questions you 
> have, and we can then drive them to resolution on the list or at 
> meetings.
Yes, my question was really where because some of this won't really fit 
into ODF 1.2 but will need to be addressed eventually. Other parts, most 
of what I have been posting, probably needs some answer in ODF 1.2.

Is there any consensus on whether posting to the list or to the wiki 
would be better? I really have no preference but was using the list 
because that gets broadcast to everyone so if it goes unread it wasn't 
for lack of notice. ;-)

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

>
> -Rob 

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)