[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Please put this discussion
Hi, yes this field is controlled by the script who inserts the field-mark. Since an application can always display the text enclosed by the field marks there is no interop problem. Many developers today use "bookmarks" to mark parts of a document which is controlled by e.g. a script etc... This lead to bookmarks beeing inserted into document which conflict with the users bookmarks. The field-marks intend is to clearly seprate user bookmarks from machine generated bookmarks. Also by enforcing a clear "name/value" parameter structure we ge a better chance of preserving and presenting data. ~Florian P.S. A note about the relationship to e.g. metadata. The metadata mechanism is incompatible with the "marking" mechanism of OOXML which is based on "special bookmarks"/Word-liel "fields". So this field-mark element is clearly for interop/harmonization and should remove the pain of using ODF bookmarks to encode MS fields... >>> <robert_weir@us.ibm.com> 05/05/08 6:44 PM >>> What are the allowed values of field:type and what do they mean? Or is this intended to be an extensibility feature with implementation-defined behaviors? -Rob "Florian Reuter" <freuter@novell.com> 05/05/2008 11:37 AM To <office@lists.oasis-open.org> cc Subject [office] Please put this discussion Hi, As discussed in the call here is an enhancement proposal I'd love to discuss: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Fieldmarks. It is very important for harmonization between ODF and OOXML. Thanks, ~Florian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]