Re: Content of fieldmarks

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Florian,

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
>   
>> Let's assume there is a <fieldmark> element that contains some content 
>> and that there are not issues with overlapping elements (that is the 
>> definition of well-formedness).
>>     
> Unfortionately this assumption doesn't hold. Fieldmarks are property nested --- this has nothing to do with XML well-formedness.
>
>   
OK, then you are going to have to explain "properly nested."

And while you are at it, please explain why it has nothing to do with 
"XML well-formedness."

I am not trying to be difficult but if you aren't going to use standard 
terminology then you really need to define what you are talking about.

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)