[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Content Regions in ODF
Greetings! The following is not an ODF 1.2 issue but it is one that I wanted to note for the future. In the discussion of Florian's fieldmark proposal, Rob observed that we have several mechanisms for marking a region of content in ODF. Actually I have found seven of them that explicitly use the -start/-end form for the elements names: <text:alphabetical-index-mark-start>, <text:alphabetical-index-mark-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:id attribute. <text:bookmark-start>, <text:bookmark-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:name attribute. <text:change-start>, <text:change-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:change-id attribute. |<text:index-entry-link-start>, <text:index-entry-link-end>, Note the schema doesn't provide any attribute to bind the two elements together. (I checked the 1.0, 1.1, and latest draft schemas.)| <text:reference-mark-start>, <text:reference-mark-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:name attribute. <text:toc-mark-start>, <text:toc-mark-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:id attribute. <text:user-index-mark-start>, <text:user-index-mark-end>, linked by having the same value in the text:id attribute. They all serve different purposes but they do have in common: 1) They mark some region of content in an ODF document 2) They mark that content without regard to the XML structure of the document As Rob suggested earlier, it might be a good idea to think about a single mechanism that marks portions of content with some means to distinguish the purpose for the marking. I can easily imagine a point plus -start/-end form of a general element with a typing attribute that has a canonical set of values established by the TC and that allows for a string extension so that developers can extend the types. Thinking that could provide some means for experimentation that is prior to the TC actually extending the list of types with defined semantics. As I said, not an ODF 1.2 issue but I thought the information might be useful in the context of the fieldmark discussion. Hope everyone is having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]