Re: [office] The proposal:auto-play presentation file format has been updated by the New Proposal Form

["Warren Turkal" <turkal@google.com>]

I still think that "slide-show" should be "presentation-slide-show" so
that it's obvious that it doesn't apply to the other document types.
We should also allow other values so that applications can define ones
that may be useful to them (e.g. x-wordprocessor-ebook, etc.). We
should also specify a naming convention for unofficial values (e.g.
x-<name>). Pending those two changes, I am in favor of the extended
option.

wt

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Ming Fei Jia <jiamingf@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> Greetings! This proposal has been updated by the New Proposal Form, also
> contains the link to the .odt format document.
>
> You can retrieve the update under "proposals under disussion" via
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument_v1.2_Action_Items.
>
> P.S, per previous TC discussion as well as by double-check the behaviors of
> MS Office and OO3.0, I changed the "play" view mode name to "slide-show"
> since "play" might cause confusion with the "play" in animation.
>
> Sincerely,
> _________________________________________________________
> Mingfei Jia
> Symphony Common Apps and Performance | jiamingf@cn.ibm.com
> IBM Corporation | Lotus Software
> 8610-8245-2493 (phone) | 915-2493 (tie-line)
>
>
> IBM Lotus Symphony
>
>