[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Digital Signature proposal
2008/7/31 Ming Fei Jia <jiamingf@cn.ibm.com>: > Thanks explanation although that can not convince me completely. You said > "...if the application developer choose to only support XMLDsig, it will > still being compliant with ODF 1.2...". Is that true? XMLDsig and XAdES are > as different options in the proposal. If the application only implements > XMLDsig, could the application claim to be compliant with ODF standard? I > think at most it can claim partial compliant. This is the conformance issue. > > Another is the interoperability issue. Assume one application only > implements XMLDsig, another application only implements XAdES. How does the > first application validate the signed document with XAdES format generated > by the second application? Seems no way,even both the two applications claim > to be compliant with the same ODF standard. A conformance issue for ODF? Seems the TC has to choose one or the other if interoperability is to work for signed documents. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]