[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: #6.8 - Errata Review
Dennis, Do you have a copy of the Japanese errata? The reason I ask is that some of the "errors" you report in my numbering is the result of finding some "other" error than the ones reported by the Japanese defect report. For example: Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Patrick, > > <snip> > > 9.3.3 300 13 304 *7* > > The defect report reads: > Section 9.3.3, 6th line on page 304 > Current description: > The <draw:object> element represents objects that have a XML > representation. > Proposal: > "a" should be "an" as follows: > The <draw:object> element represents objects that have an XML > representation. > That "defect" appears on line 6 of ISO 26300: Text documents –Drawings –Presentations •Objects that do not have an XML representation. These objects only have a binary representation, An example for this kind of objects OLE objects (see [OLE]). The <draw:object> element represents objects that have a XML representation. The <draw:object-ole> element represents objects that only have a binary representation. I have introduced line breaks to match the text of ISO 26300. The errata appears me to be rather clearly on line 6. Yes? BTW, the original Japanese defect report can be seen at: http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/0942rev1.htm (no login required) Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]