RE: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Patrick, there are many errata items where the page and line references are
correct for both documents.  When I did my original errata review, I worked
mainly from the ODF 1.0 OASIS Standard (-os.pdf) and I checked the ed.2-cs1
only when inspection showed an unusual difference or the erratum had
problems.  If I saw no problem with the erratum in the OASIS Standard, I
often looked no further.  (I had procrastinated and I wanted to make the
Friday deadline.)

Because I found a few page-and-line deviations in the first review, I
decided to check them all now.  That's how I found my additional list of
suspects (plus some additional items that I noticed while inspecting for
line numbers).

 - Dennis   

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00025.html
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 03:57
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office] Re: #6.8 - Errata Review

Dennis,

Thanks!

I will be checking these this week as well.

I don't know why I would be off consistently on the ISO 26300 numbers 
but agree that they need to be proofed, again.

Hope you are at the start of a great week!

Patrick

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00024.html
[ ... ]