Re: [office] 17.5 on IRIs

[Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>]

On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 10:28 +0100, Bob Jolliffe wrote:

> 
> On the basis of my experience above, I have worked on the assumption
> that the way to interpret a relative IRI is that it is always relative
> to the root directory of the package.

To use your words from a different situation, this starts to stretch the
meaning of relative and is quite strange. This would be akin of relative
path names in a shell to always refer to the home directory of the user
rather than the current location.

Andreas
-- 
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca>
Concordia University College of Alberta