Re: [office] Errata: Substantive Schema Change in 15.27.22?

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Michael,

Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> Patrick,
>
<snip>
> This is one option. The options we discussed for ODF 1.1 are here:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200606/msg00075.html
>
> We actually decided to take option b), that is, to just correct the 
> errors in the schema. This still may be an option for the ODF 1.0 
> errata, too.
>
> However, since we received the error report for 15.27.22 already and 
> resolved it already by making a change in ODF 1.1 although we could 
> have made a change in ODF 1.0 2nd edition, I think it is valid to 
> refer to that resolution, rather than reverting that resolution.
>
Ah, ok, that is where I got diverted. Sure, simply refer to the earlier 
resolution. By "reverting" you mean "re-writing" that resolution.

Works for me.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau 
patrick@durusau.net 
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) 
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)