[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Meeting Effectiveness and Maintenance SC
My impression is that the TC Coordination Calls work best with the work off-line to the calls and actions requiring voting well prepared prior to the call (with the probe for comments prior to that call). I also think that creation of a Maintenance Committee is timely, although I can see polling the TC list on items where we would be baffled or uncertain about the committee's desired direction. I am available for such work along with Michael, Rob, Patrick, and others. In my case, it is part of my gaining mastery over the specification so I can contribute more properly on technical matter, so now is a good time before the spec hiccups become invisible to me. - Dennis PS: I am concerned a little about the number of weekly calls I may be dealing with. I need to revamp my home-office telephony arrangements, I think. -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00004.html Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 22:02 To: 'OpenDocument Mailing List' Subject: RE: [office] ODF TC call agenda and duration If we can keep the main TC meetings to an hour, I think that is preferable. The critical thing is for the meetings to focus on things that require a quorum of TC members to accomplish. These are formally items which require votes by OASIS TC process or by the TC's standing rules. If we are spending TC time on things that does not require all of, then we are probably not operating as efficiently as we could. I notice that we have been spending a large amount of time recently on defect reports and errata. Although this is important work, it is probably not something that should dominate our TC call time. We should be spending most of our time on ODF 1.2 proposals that are ready for approval, or nearly so. That is my opinion. Does anyone disagree with that premise? [ ... ] It appears that Japan has submitted a 2nd defect report on ODF 1.0. Nothing surprising. More typographical errors, much of it which we've already seen. But we will need to process these, as well as other comments received by the public. Rather than dominate TC time with these important, but less time sensitive issues, I wonder whether it is now appropriate to create a Maintenance SC? Participants in this SC would be responsible for reviewing incoming comments and defect reports on existing ODF TC deliverables, and proposing dispositions (fix via errata, fix in next version, no fix, etc.) and drafting errata documents. Both proposed dispositions and draft errata documents would be submitted to the full TC for review and approval. [ ... ] "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 09/29/2008 09:33:46 AM: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00112.html [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]