[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Required items for a public review
Dennis, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > And that it please the reviewer and commenter deities, let us line number > the documents this time and provide cross-referencing section numbers as > deep as there are heading lines, even if the TOC doesn't go that low? > > I think the cross-referencing is already as deep as you request. On line numbering, allowing for operator error, ;-), I am not sure it will work for tables. I tested with both OOo 2.4 and 3.0 and automatic numbering did not number lines in a table. Would you want the line numbering to start over at the beginning of every page? (That would be my preference but I realize opinions may vary on that score.) I assume from your comments you mean that we should number every line (as opposed to every fifth line)? Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > - Dennis > > PS: I just saw a nice document where every fifth line was numbered. I think > we should number them all automatically. > > -----Original Message----- > From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 02:46 > To: office@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office] Required items for a public review > > Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM wrote on 11/14/2008 09:58:57 AM: > >> Der TC members, >> >> below is a list of items that in my opinion have to be addressed before >> we can submit ODF 1.2 for a public review >> >> > > A) Public review is one step along the path to approval as an OASIS > Standard. For the benefit of TC members who have not been through this > process before, the important steps are: > > 1) Approval of a Committee Draft. This can be done at any time, by Full > Majority Vote of the TC. There are no other requirements. The TC can > issue as many numbered Committee Drafts as it wishes. I'd like the TC to > make more use of this level of approval, considering that we have some > stakeholders/partners, such as the accessibility SC, or JTC1/SC34 members, > who may want more time to review and discuss an ODF 1.2 draft than > provided for in a 2-month public review. > > So I'd recommend that we approve a Committee Draft and notify the > Accessibility SC and JTC1/SC34 of it as soon as the following minimal > requirements are met: > [ ... ] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]