[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Approach to Disposition of Comments and Defect Reports
Great! Regarding item 5, I had been thinking that there would need to be a provisional response to SC34 that indicated receipt and our first-pass assignment of classification and disposition without actually have agreed on an errata item and incorporation in any specific Errata or a newer specification, etc. I thought of this because of the time-limit for (initial) responses that JTC1 wants. If having them track through our handling of public comments, that certainly works for me. I like the idea of having people able to check our Public Comments document and see the status. We need to distinguish between provisional classifications made by someone (such as all of the red-lined and blue-lined items in the current one that have not been reviewed by the TC as a whole), and entries that reflect the latest determination of the TC. Maybe that won't actually be a problem. Publishing a monthly update (reminds me of old Usenet list FAQ posts) on odf-comment seems like a great idea. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00058.html Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 09:39 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [office] Approach to Disposition of Comments and Defect Reports "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 12/08/2008 11:22:35 AM: [ ... ] > 5. Disposition responses will indicate our initial categorization > and screening, so that the contributors can tell what action if any > is to be taken, and when they might see a result. > All comments, whether from SC34 or from the public, should be recorded and classified. The classification, whether editorial or technical, can sometimes be controversial. So the classifications should be approved at the same time the proposed resolutions are approved by the TC. The whole approved set of data (the defect, the classification, the proposed resolutions) we can call the proposed "Disposition of Comments" should posted at a fixed, publicly accessible URL. We should put a link to that URL on the TC's home page. We could also post a monthly reminder note to the comment list indicating this URL, as well as other administrivia regarding public comments, errata, etc. Anyone who wants to know the status of a given comment can check the document at the given URL. So it might look like this: a) comments come in to comment list from wherever b) someone (me? you?) is assigned to transcribe the comments into the spreadsheet and record basic metadata, such as proposer, date, part and section numbers, etc. c) We put on the TC agenda (as we have been doing) time to discuss and process new comments on the spreadsheet. The TC would determine the classification and resolution, which would be recorded and published. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]