[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Please read: Procedure proposal for ODF 1.2 proposals
OK. I'll allocate my 5 votes as follows. -Rob Jomar Silva +1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/DSigProposal Ming Fei Jia +1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/add_list_level_attribute_to_style%3Astyle +1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/data_cache%2C_field_name_and_source_field_id_for_data_pilot_tables Thorsten Zachmann http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/use_draw:id_in_custom_slide_shows (I'm not 100% sure about this since the request was somehow unclear) Dennis Hamilton +1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Version_Significance http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Document_Types http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Document_Structure http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Document_Processing_Model Florian Reuter http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Fieldmarks http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Grouping_for_Radio_Elements http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/display_names_in_data_pilot http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/PageBreak http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/BreakOddEvenAuto http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/HeaderFooterFirst http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ClarifyShinkAndFit Michael Brauer http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Table-Protected Svante Schubert +1 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00085.html (Svante combined three proposals into one. For this reason, I have use a reference to his mail here) ___________________________ Rob Weir Lead IBM ODF Architect Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Software Group email: robert_weir@us.ibm.com phone: 1-978-399-7122 blog: http://www.robweir.com/blog/ Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM wrote on 12/11/2008 05:59:47 AM: > > Dear TC members, > > the deadline for requesting proposals for consideration in ODF 1.2 has > passed. > > The consideration of 16 proposals has been requested. We have 6 TC > members that requested the inclusion of at least one proposal, and the > number of requests per TC members varies between 1 and 7. > > The assumption for the schedule we agreed in the last TC call was that > we have 5 requests, and we agreed to make a decision how to proceed in > the next call if the number of requests is above 5. We got 16 requests. > We therefore need to decide now how to proceed. > > I have discussed the situation with Rob, and this what we would like to > propose: > > 1) All TC members with voting rights (a list is below) have 5 votes > that they can cast on any set of proposals. Voters can split their vote > among 5 different proposals, put all their 5 votes on a single proposal, > or divide them up in any way they choice, among the proposals listed. > > 2) This votes are cast by sending the vote allocations to the mailing > list before the TC meeting on Monday. > > 3) The votes themselves are non-binding until the TC, in the meeting on > Monday, the 15th of December, decides to give them a meaning. > > 4) In the meeting on Monday, the 15th of December, the TC votes to > consider those 5 or 6 (or another number to be decided on) proposals for > inclusion into ODF 1.2, that got the most votes. > Note: Five is the number of proposals we worked with in the last TC > call. Six is the number of TC members that have requested the > consideration of a proposal. Taking six proposals would mean that at > least in theory one proposal per TC member could be elected. We should > be able to process six proposals without changing the schedule. > > Using this approach, everyone has equal voice in what proposals are > processed. > > *While the TC needs to agree to give the votes described above a > meaning, I would like to ask all voting TC members to cast their votes > in order to make a good decision in the meeting on Monday.* > > Please note that the votes you are casting are not regarding the > proposals itself, but only whether they should be considered for ODF > 1.2. > > This means that the proposals that are considered for inclusion > still need to pass the proposal acceptance process successfully, which > is defined by our standing rule and the rules we agreed on the last TC > call. > > Vice versa, if a proposal that is not elected for consideration in > ODF 1.2, then this does not mean that the proposal itself is rejected, > and TC members should not interpret the votes that way. If a proposal is > not elected to be considered in ODF 1.2, then these proposals still > should be considered for a later version of ODF, and I would like to > encourage the TC members to advance such proposals to make sure they > will be considered in the next ODF version. > > > The following TC members have voting rights: > > Michael Brauer > Patrick Durusau > Dennis Hamilton > Mingfei Jia > Bob Jolliffe > Jun Ma > Doug Mahugh > Eric Patterson > Eike Rathke > Florian Reuter > Jomar Silva > Rob Weir > David Wheeler > Oliver Wittmann > > > Best regards > > Michael > > -- > Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering > StarOffice/OpenOffice.org > Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 > D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com > http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 > http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, > D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten > Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]