[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.2 specification draft 1.2- chapters 6 and 7]]

[Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems<Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM>]

Hi Oliver,

can you please answer Patrick's question - see below.

Send the answer to me - I will forward it to the ODF TC's mailing list.


Thanks in advance, Oliver.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [office] Review of ODF 1.2 specification draft 
1.2 - chapters 6 and 7]
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:41:48 -0500
From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
To: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems 
<Oliver-Rainer.Wittmann@Sun.COM>
CC: ODF TC <office@lists.oasis-open.org>
References: <493FA3FE.80900@sun.com>

Oliver,

A quick question on the "sender" fields:

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems wrote:
<snip>
>>>> - comment to future note in sub chapter "6.3.7.1 <text:author-name>":
>>>> text:author-name is not a duplicate of dc:creator. text:author-name 
>>>> is the author of the document, while dc:creator is the creator of 
>>>> this ODF stream. E.g. Oliver create a new text document in ODF and 
>>>> stores it - text:author-name="Oliver" and dc:creator="Oliver". 
>>>> Oliver sends the document to Michael for review. Michael opens the 
>>>> document, makes his corrections and stores the document - 
>>>> text:author-name="Oliver" and dc:creator="Michael".
>>> Sorry, you lost me there.
>>>
>>> What you describe sounds like Michael, as the second author of the 
>>> document, is listed for dc:creator.
>>>
>>> Ah, so is "sender" just bad prose? What it means is a subsequent 
>>> author of content in the file?
>>>
>>> I was wondering how the application was going to realize it had been 
>>> "sent."
>>>
>>> So, I should remove the sender language and simply say additional 
>>> author?
> The 'Author' created the document and the 'Sender' ist the one who
> changed the document. 'Sender' is not a good choice :-;
OK, I can't change the text:sender-* element names (not in this release)
but I can change the prose to be more appropriate.

My suggestion is to use the phrase "a subsequent author" in place of
sender in the prose.

Under the general introduction I will explain the divergence from the
text:sender-* language.

Question: It is fair to say that an application could choose to support
more than one subsequent author? That is it could maintain multiple sets
of what we now call text:sender-* elements?

The current schema doesn't seem to prohibit that usage but I wanted to
ask to be sure.

Hope you are looking forward to a great week!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


-- 
=======================================================================
Sun Microsystems GmbH    Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Nagelsweg 55             Software Engineer - OpenOffice.org/StarOffice
20097 Hamburg
Germany                  Fax:   (+49 40) 23 646 955
http://www.sun.de        mailto:oliver-rainer.wittmann@sun.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

=======================================================================
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann (od) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS