[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF all versions)
Moving the discussion to the office list, where it belongs... "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 02/21/2009 05:32:30 PM: > > However, I think Postel's law is a great argument in favor of predictable, > permissive foreign-element handling. > > - Dennis > Indeed, it is a good argument for an application handling such content. But it is a poor argument for allowing such markup in conformant documents. It simply doesn't follow. Look at HTML, by analogy. Most web pages are not valid HTML. Many are not even well formed. Should we then allow invalid and malformed documents to be considered conformant HTML? I don't think so. But the presence of such documents on the web is a good argument for designing a web browser to be robust when given such non-conforming documents. You could certainly specify such a robustness requirement in the conformance clause for an HTML processor. -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]