[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public comments 275-313
Dear TC members, please find below suggestion (or proposals) for the public comments 275-313: 275 has been discussed already. I only noticed that the link in the spreadsheet is incorrect. Must be: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00101.html 276: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00102.html (Please note that the link in the sheet is incorrect) Duplicate to 268 277: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00103.html The suggested clarification would be okay for ODF 1.0/1.1, but the current text seems not to be as unclear that including it into an errata appears necessary. For ODF 1.2, the suggested clarification appears reasonable to be added. The suggestion regarding the schema appears to be an interesting option for a post 1.2 version. 278: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00104.html Suggestion (for 4.3.1 in ODF 1.2): The numbering may be restarted with a specific _number_ at each list item. 279: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00106.html Has been reworded in ODF 1.2 (section 4.3.2) and should be clearer now. 280: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00107.html Duplicate to 279. 281: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200807/msg00108.html Suggestion (for 17.871.2 in ODF 1.2): This attribute _is only evaluated for_ items in a list with a numbering list style. 282-284: -> Formula SC/ODF-Next SC 285: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00002.html Whether or not a content.xml is mandatory has been clarified in the ODF 1.2 conformance section. Suggestion: Add a statement that META-INF/manifest.xml is mandatory in the ODF 1.2 part 3 conformance section, when they are reworked. 286: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00008.html Suggestion: Adopt suggestion from comment 287: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00009.html Suggestion: Adopt suggestion from comment 288: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00010.html The sentence in question has been removed from the ODF 1.2 draft. 289-295: -> Formula SC 296/297: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00026.html Already resolved in ODF 1.2 298-302: -> Formula SC 303: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00061.html Proposal regarding ODF 1.0 errata. This has been approved already. 304: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00062.html Is off-topic. Rob responded already. 305-313: -> Formula SC Best regards Michael -- Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55 D-20097 Hamburg, Germany michael.brauer@sun.com http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500 http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]