[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1657) Editor Note: Section17.6 anim: formula

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12060#action_12060 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-1657:
-----------------------------------------

Sorry, my comment was unclear. What I was suggesting was that there be *one* grammar for the attribute value and if particular uses only need a subset of that, so be it. But there would be only one grammar. 

Is that clearer? 

My concern is with the changing grammar depending upon the element where the attribute appears. Perfectly find for a particular context to only need part of the grammar, my question is why not simply define it broadly enough that we don't have to treat those cases as exceptions. 

> Editor Note: Section 17.6 anim: formula

> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-1657
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1657
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2
>
>
> Transcribed from ODF_Revised_Editorial_Notes_27May2009.odt
> Original author: Patrick Durusau
> Section 17.6 anim: formula
> Ed. Note Candidate for EBNF statement and needs to better specify (remove) the difference in the attribute value based on where it appears

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira