[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-draft12.odt
Are you accepting Rob's modification and moving the substitute question now? - Dennis PS: I think we need to be very specific in our language when we are using the list to forward deliberations by making motions, seconding motions, etc. -----Original Message----- From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200910/msg00307.html Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 07:27 To: robert_weir@us.ibm.com Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [office] OpenDocument-v1.2-part3-draft12.odt On 10/16/09 15:41, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote: > +1 for conducting the ballot. Since approving a CD and sending it out to > public review both require a Full Majority Vote, we should be able to do > this in a single ballot. But we will need some additional language in the > ballot question. > > I think we have the main question as: > > "Shall the OASIS ODF TC approve ODF 1.2, Part III, Draft 12 as a Committee > Draft and to send that Committee Draft out for a 60-day Public Review?" Yes, that's correct. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]