[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-2372) 3.10.7 Database -comments on good practice - delete or note?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eike Rathke updated OFFICE-2372: -------------------------------- Component/s: OpenFormula Fix Version/s: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 2 > 3.10.7 Database - comments on good practice - delete or note? > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-2372 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2372 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: OpenFormula > Reporter: Patrick Durusau > Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 2 > > > I have marked the following paragraphs in the current text: > "It is considered good practice to define a named range for a database because it eases maintenance (the range can be changed for all functions by changing just one definition). However, the use of named ranges for a database is not required by this specification. > Formulas may use different portions of a database by using different ranges, but since this often indicates a defective spreadsheet, implementations may warn when this occurs. Applications may support access to external databases as well, though this is not required by this specification." > Should they simply be deleted or turned into notes? > If notes they need to be re-worded. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]