[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] Two JIRA Issues for discussion
Michael, Switching the schema is a big step but I assume that there are tools to measure formal equivalence of schemas? I haven't looked, therefore the question. If there were some assurance other than "eye balling" the two schemas, I would feel more confident about a last minute change. Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend! Patrick Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: > Hi > > there are two JIRA issues I'd like to discuss in the next TC meeting: > > 1) http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2215 > > The question here is whether or not we want to switch to XSD as schema > language for the digital signature schema. > > > 2) http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2214 > > The question here is whether we want to make changes to the RNG schema > right now, or for ODF-Next. > > We actually got a contribution for an ODF schema for part 1 that does > not use the "combine" attribute: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/201002/msg00022.html > > However, changing the schema in the last minute of cause has some > risks. The current schema is well tested, and while there have been > changes for ODF 1.2, it is in use since ODF 1.0. > > So, maybe, we should just switch to a new schema structure as first > action for ODF 1.3/2.0 rather than the last one for ODF 1.2? > > Michael > > -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]