OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2533) Public Comment:Office 1.2 comment: metadata: issues with RDFa



    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17949#action_17949 ] 

Svante Schubert  commented on OFFICE-2533:
------------------------------------------

The comment concerns ODF 1.2 Part1 s4.2.1 which deals with various
xhtml:* attributes, referencing the RDFa specification.

The W3C XHTML Modularization 1.1. specification says:
"Each of the attributes defined in an XHTML attribute collection is
available for use when their corresponding module is included in an
XHTML Host Language or an XHTML Integration Set. In such a situation,
the attributes are available for use in the definition of elements that
are NOT in the XHTML namespace when they are referenced using their
namespace-qualified identifier (e.g., xhtml:class). The semantics of the
attributes remain the same regardless of whether they are referenced
using their qualified identifier or not. It is an error to use an XHTML
namespace-qualified attribute on elements from the XHTML Namespace."

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_commonatts

Therefore the ODF 1.2 part1 section 4.2.1 is legitimate.
By splitting the author`s comment into three parts, the three of the
four parts (1, 2 and 4) are answered, where he stated
    1) The XHTML specification never defines any attributes called
xhtml:property, xhtml:datatype, xhtml:about and so on.
    2) The W3C RDFa-in-XHTML recommendation does not provide an adequate
mechanism for use in other standards
    4) In any case, the attributes in the xhtml: namespace are not
actually defined by XHTML.


Finally regarding part 3 of the author`s comment, where the author
    3) Points out to metadata solutions of HTML5 other than RDFa.

As long HTML5 is not a W3C recommendation the specification is still
able to change and unfortunately not usable by us.




> Public Comment: Office 1.2 comment:  metadata: issues with RDFa
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2533
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2533
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 4 
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Robert Weir 
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: rjelliffe@allette.com.au 
> Original date: 14 Feb 2010 15:09:40 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/201002/msg00024.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]