OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (OFFICE-1809)NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-17



    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18122#action_18122 ] 

Dennis Hamilton edited comment on OFFICE-1809 at 3/22/10 5:32 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

I note that the defect report includes section 8.4.5 in the issue posed by the defect item.

Section 8.4.5 is not addressed in the proposed resolution in ODF 1.0 Errata CD04.

For 8.4.4, the description of the table:name attribute in the table:operation element is changed.  This is a great improvement that includes elimination of the notion of something going invisible.  This can be tightened a little and probably should be if this defect is re-visited to complete the coverage. [MY OVERSIGHT: I overlooked the Errata CD04 treatment of 8.4.4 Detective Operation, the top-level paragraph.  The changed form remains obscure, relying on some undiscribed discovery process, detective operations and unnamed relationships.  Furthermore, the role of the table:index, if any, in reconciling collisions with detective "operations" on other involved cells is now removed.]

I suspect there are defect-report concerns that remain to be addressed in sections 8.4.3-8.4.5.

      was (Author: orcmid):
    I note that the defect report includes section 8.4.5 in the issue posed by the defect item.

Section 8.4.5 is not addressed in the proposed resolution in ODF 1.0 Errata CD04.

Furthermore, the only aspect of concern that is addressed for 8.4.4 is use of the table:name attribute in the table:operation element.  This is a great improvement that includes elimination of the notion of something going invisible.  Can be tightened a little and probably should be if this defect is re-visited to complete the coverage..

I suspect there are more substantial concerns that remain to be addressed.
  
> NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER  JP2-17
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-1809
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1809
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>             Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER 	JP2-17
> QUALIFIER 	clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT 	Clauses 8.4.3 thru 8.4.5
> NATURE OF DEFECT 	In our opinion, subclauses 8.4.3 thru 8.4.5 are underspecified and incomprehensible. They do not provide enough background information or examples. Moreover, the semantics of trace-dependents, remove-dependents, trace-precedents, remove-precedents, trace-errors. trace-dependents and remove-dependents are not specified at all.
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER 	

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]