OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

office message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-1812) NEEDS-DISCUSSION:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-21



     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dennis Hamilton updated OFFICE-1812:
------------------------------------

              Summary: NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-21  (was: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER 	JP2-21)
        Fix Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
                           (was: ODF 1.0 Errata 02)
                           (was: ODF 1.2)
    Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0
                       ODF 1.0 Errata 02

1. There is no account here for the errata that was actually produced in ODF 1.0 Errata CD04.

2. The instructions to delete material is incomplete.  All text from "A typical syntax" down to the beginning of the schema fragment should be deleted.

3. It makes no sense to say there is a namespace prefix followed by an implementation-dependent Boolean expression.  Since a namespace prefix is required, it is perfectly safe to say what the namespace accomplishes.  I would say that the absence of a namespace prefix has implementation-dependent interpretation.

4. QUESTION: Since, formally, the separating colon is not part of the namespace prefix according to [xml-names], can we go so far as to say that there is a colon followed by a Boolean expression whose syntax and semantics is specified under the namespace bound to the prefix?

> NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-21
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-1812
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1812
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>             Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER 	JP2-21
> QUALIFIER 	clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT 	"Condition" in Clause 8.5.3 (original text incorrectly said '8.5.2'
> NATURE OF DEFECT 	The BNF in this subclause is very unclear. Where is whitespace allowed? Which symbol is a non-terminal symbol and which is a terminal symbol?
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER 	Use ISO 14977.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]