[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-1820) NEEDS-DISCUSSION:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-29
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dennis Hamilton updated OFFICE-1820:
------------------------------------
Summary: NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-29 (was: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-29)
Fix Version/s: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
(was: ODF 1.0 Errata 02)
Affects Version/s: ODF 1.0
ODF 1.0 Errata 02
1. It appears that 9.2.11 would have been helped immeasurably by reference to 15.20 and that could have helped in the resolution of N1078:27 (See Office-1818).
2. I think the defect claimed here is legitimate and could indeed be solved in the manner requested. This would seem to be purely expository and should not contradict implementations, unless there is a serious concern that implementations have interpreted the <draw:measure> element, the related attributes and properties in conflicting ways.
3. In either case, I believe that the resolution "Rejected, the correction of this defect would exceed the limits of OASIS errata and therefore it will
be addressed in ODF 1.2. The behavior in question is implementation dependent for purposes of ISO 26300." is inappropriate. First, this is an Errata document for ODF 1.0 and the statement about IS 26300 is inappropriate. A corrigenda derived by transposition of this errata to IS 26300, but I don't think it belongs here. Secondly, if the "behavior in question" is implementation-dependent, we should say so.
4. It seems if we are going to identify the implementation dependency, it requires something like the following:
Add at the end of the first paragraph of section 15.20 the following sentence:
"""
Interpretation and realization of measure properties is implementation dependent.
"""
> NEEDS-DISCUSSION: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-29
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1820
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1820
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Patrick Durusau
> Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-29
> QUALIFIER clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT Clause 15.20
> NATURE OF DEFECT This subclause is understandable only if the reader uses OpenOffice and examines the output. Such descriptions are very inappropriate as ISO/IEC standards.
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER Add diagrams and explain "reference points", "measure line", "guides", and so forth.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]