[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Discussions: Options for ODF Versions at JTC1
Here are my thoughts on the topic raised in today's ODF TC Teleconference Meeting. It strikes me that we want to stabilize ODF 1.1 aligned with IS 26300. (This might involve Errata for OASIS 1.1 to achieve alignment with an IS 26300:2006/AMD.) Because of overlap with the development of ODF 1.2 and the differences in conformance requirements and language throughout 1.2, I think that ODF 1.2 should be submitted as a separate three-part specification, if we can do so. I also think that the two specifications will co-exist for a considerable time, and that a stabilized ODF 1.1 will be important with regard to documents that continue to exist and how they can continue to be consumed properly even as ODF 1.2, ODF-Next, etc., continue to progress. I think that the comment that Rob made about having a matrix that maps provisions among the different versions of ODF to be very interesting. I don't think that challenge can be resolved in the timeframe within which we hope to advance ODF 1.2 to ISO adoption, however. That seems to be something best done later when it is also clear what the feature update of ODF 1.1 implementations has been, what OIC has been able to ascertain about interoperability that impacts future ODFs, etc. Also, if the schemas are significantly different between versions, it may still be necessary to maintain the separate individual schemas in any consolidation. - Dennis Dennis E. Hamilton ------------------ NuovoDoc: Design for Document System Interoperability mailto:Dennis.Hamilton@acm.org | gsm:+1-206.779.9430 http://NuovoDoc.com http://ODMA.info/dev/ http://nfoWorks.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]