[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2295) STDEVA
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18396#action_18396 ] Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-2295: ----------------------------------------- Considering that not all of the functions with A (and without) seem consistent out in the world, according to the notes, this does seem to be a problem. My question is more about the implications of ratifying STDEVA in a standard in a way that does not seem to improve interoperability very well in the cases it is defined for. I guess another way of asking my question is, do we consider this the responsible thing to do? > STDEVA > ------- > > Key: OFFICE-2295 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2295 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: OpenFormula > Reporter: Robert Weir > Assignee: Andreas Guelzow > Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 1 > > > == 6.17.71 STDEVA == > The text "cells with text are converted to 0;" conflicts with "The > handling of strings is implementation defined." -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]