[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2404) NEEDS-DISCUSSION:4.2.2.1 manifest.rdf, mandatory or not ?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18493#action_18493 ] Michael Brauer commented on OFFICE-2404: ---------------------------------------- Dennis: Do you agree to the resolution, and if not, do you have an alternative suggestion? Can we remove the "NEEDS-DISCUSSION", or what is still open? > NEEDS-DISCUSSION: 4.2.2.1 manifest.rdf, mandatory or not ? > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-2404 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2404 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Metadata > Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 1, ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 4 > Reporter: Bart Hanssens > Assignee: Michael Brauer > Priority: Minor > Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 3 CD 2, ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5 > > > 4.2.2.1 says > "The OpenDocument document contains a metadata manifest," > Reading part 3, section 2.6 Metadata > "A document or sub document that is stored in a package may contain an arbitrary number of metadata files.... > All metadata files of a document or sub document shall be listed in a separate metadata manifest file, which has the file name "manifest.rdf"" > So it seems that it is absolutely required to have a metadata.rdf manifest file, even if there are no RDF metadata files at all ? Is that correct ? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]