[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (OFFICE-1052) Public Comment: ODFF:DAYS360
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eike Rathke updated OFFICE-1052:
--------------------------------
Proposal:
In Semantics, add to both methods:
1. If StartDate > EndDate then swap dates.
Add note to 30US/360 method:
Note: Some evaluators do not swap dates if StartDate > EndDate and therefor treat some combinations of dates falling on the last day of a month incorrectly.
Description:
Copied from office-comment list
Original author: "David King" <openoffice@drking.plus.com>
Original date: 12 Aug 2008 22:00:01 -0000
Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00022.html
From that comment mail:
DAYS360 and financial date systems
* Consider whether to specify compliance with the Excel NASD date bug or introduce a switch for NASD compliance. The bug has to be mentioned I think.
* The date systems implemented by Excel and specified by ODFF are only a subset of date systems used in practice, which might be worth noting.
was:
Copied from office-comment list
Original author: "David King" <openoffice@drking.plus.com>
Original date: 12 Aug 2008 22:00:01 -0000
Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00022.html
Assignee: Eike Rathke (was: Robert Weir )
We have an implicit conversion from Boolean to Number (Integer), so no problem.
Regarding the original comment:
#1 We don't strive to be Excel bug compatible. Yes, OOo replicated that bug for interoperability, as also stated in the offset note. However, we can hardly say in a standard that evaluators may replicate a bug of Excel.. We almost do that for "1900 is a leap year", but...
#2 We do not want to specify more date systems than evaluators currently implement.
> Public Comment: ODFF: DAYS360
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1052
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1052
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: OpenFormula
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Eike Rathke
> Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 3
>
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: "David King" <openoffice@drking.plus.com>
> Original date: 12 Aug 2008 22:00:01 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200808/msg00022.html
> From that comment mail:
> DAYS360 and financial date systems
> * Consider whether to specify compliance with the Excel NASD date bug or introduce a switch for NASD compliance. The bug has to be mentioned I think.
> * The date systems implemented by Excel and specified by ODFF are only a subset of date systems used in practice, which might be worth noting.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]