[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OFFICE-2638) 19.511style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear
19.511 style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear --------------------------------------------------------- Key: OFFICE-2638 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638 Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5 Reporter: Patrick Durusau Assignee: Patrick Durusau Priority: Minor Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5 The value scale-min now reads: "scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." The value scale reads: "scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved." I was replacing the "equals" in scale-min when I noticed that "...is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." isn't meaningful. Nor does it make much sense to say that "...the calculated width or height is a minimum height.." Both width and height are a minimum height? Is the purpose to say that the original ratio of the original object size is not preserved? (implementation dependent?) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]