Re: [office] REQUEST on Adjustments and Reballoting for ODF 1.2 PublicReview

[Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>]

On 06/09/10 17:55, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>  1. I assume that the new ballot will be conducted electronically, given a
> motion and a second after the modified documents are available.  That way we
> are not hindered by the absence of a meeting on Monday, June 14.

Sorry for the late reply. I was out of the office the last three days.

> 
>  2. Can we please identify the materials for the ballot as CD05-revo1 so
> that what we approve becomes CD06 as approved for submission to Public
> Review?  I know that this will be minor for Parts 1-3, but for the
> main/master or whatever it is, there will be body as well as front-matter
> changes.  (I am attempting to avoid confusion over what particular documents
> are and having two documents with the same identification.)

I don't think we can call the new draft cd05-rev01. Since the ballot was 
invalid, we have not approved a CD05. Therefore, we can't call the new 
drafts CD05.

> 
>  3. WHAT DO WE CALL THE FRONT PIECE?  It is easy to talk about and refer to
> sections in Parts 1-3.  How do we and others refer to the single document
> formerly known as Part 0?  It is confusing to call it simply ODF 1.2 CD0x
> since that is also the name for the composite set.

Formally, the document is "the standard". Informally, I'm calling this 
the overview document.

Michael

>   Although it doesn't quite serve the function, I would not object to it
> being "Overview" or something (especially if none of Parts 1-3 have such a
> section - I haven't checked).  I don't know what should be the title of that
> portion, but we need and others need some unambiguous way when we need to
> discuss something in that portion of the specification.
> 
>  - Dennis
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 16:34
> To: OpenDocument Mailing List
> Cc: Kim Goolsby (E-mail)
> Subject: Fwd: [office] Public Review Request for ODF 1.2 CD 05
> 
> 
> In the main specification:
> 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It
> should be: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen
> t-v1.1.html
> 
> 2. Section 1 must include terminology and at a minimum a normative reference
> to either RFC 2119 or the related ISO reference.
> 
> 
> In Part 1:
> 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It
> should be: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen
> t-v1.1.html
> 2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be
> activated.
> 
> 
> In Part 2:
> 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It
> should be: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen
> t-v1.1.html
> 2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be
> activated.
> 
> 
> In Part 3:
> 1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It
> should be: 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocumen
> t-v1.1.html
> 2. Activate trademark link at bottom of Notices
> 3. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be
> activated.
> 4. Appendix A is empty?
> 
> 
> Also, it should be noted that the ballot to approve as CD and submit for
> public review is invalid and will need to be conducted again (or approved by
> a full majority vote in a TC meeting). The OASIS TC Process requires that
> all TC ballots be set to include votes of 'yes', 'no', and 'abstain'; this
> ballot was set to yes / no only.
> 
> 
> As soon as we updated copies and a new minutes or ballot reference, we'll
> proceed with the review.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mary
> 
> 
> Mary P McRae
> Director, Standards Development
> Technical Committee Administrator
> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org 
> web: www.oasis-open.org
> twitter: @fiberartisan  #oasisopen
> phone: 1.603.232.9090
> 
> Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
	   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jürgen Kunz