[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Not specific to this attribute, example only
>> The defined values for the dr3d:texture-filter attribute are: >> disabled: texture filtering should not be enabled. >> enabled: texture filtering should be enabled. (...) >What is the alternative? > >"disabled: texture filtering shall not be enabled." > >But this is not really testable unless the semantics of "texture filtering" is fully defined. Mmz, so what's the difference between testing "shalls" and the "should not" ? I assume one needs some semantics to test it anyway :-) Or is it merely a suggestion for the Consumer ? Then the values should probably be "recommended / discouraged" instead of "enabled / disabled" >"disabled: texture filtering is disabled." > > But that is just tautological. True. So perhaps add a note at the beginning of the document that says something like "enabled simply means that feature X is enabled" and only provide additional info when the is something to explain. Best regards Bart
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]