[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-3140) 19.876,text:style-name, 19.876.22 <text:list>, "implementation specific" -implementation defined or dependent?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=20922#action_20922 ] Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-3140: ----------------------------------------- OK, but see: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3123 Where Oliver argues that implementations should not have to define default styles. I am leaving this issue "unapplied" so we can sort out what to do for default styles. Personally I like the stance of forcing documentation of default styles but can see Oliver's point as well. Upgrading this issue to blocker to serve for the entire issue of default styles. > 19.876, text:style-name, 19.876.22 <text:list>, "implementation specific" - implementation defined or dependent? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-3140 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3140 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Text > Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05 > Reporter: Patrick Durusau > Assignee: Patrick Durusau > Fix For: ODF 1.2 CD 06 > > > 19.876, text:style-name, 19.876.22 <text:list>, "implementation specific" - implementation defined or dependent? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]