[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3027
Dennis, On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:00 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I always read ":" as if it says "namely". > > I agree that we could break it down and separate the provision from the illustration, now that there may be multiple ways to do these things. > > I left that text along because if the illustrative material were removed, there would be nothing different between 3.4.1 and 3.4.2. > > Can we look at this after you have an editor-revision and we can review it all in context? > Sure. I will go ahead an paste in the requested text as is and make a note to post further suggestions on it to the list. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:patrick@durusau.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 10:39 > To: office > Subject: [office] http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3027 > > Greetings! > > Working http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-3027 and the > suggested text reads: > > > > The three stages of the encryption process proceed as follows, using > > the legacy algorithms to illustrate each stage: > > 3.4.2 of Part 3. > > OK, but the first step reads: > > > > 1. The start key is generated: The byte sequence representing the > > password in UTF-8 is used to generate a 20-byte SHA1 digest > > (see [RFC3174]). > > Is the only *normative* text: > > 1. The start key is generated: > > ??? > > The rest is just note material? > > If it is illustration, I can make notes for each of the three steps. > > Or do we mean to specify any of this in the current standard? > > Thanks! > > Patrick > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]