Re: [office-requirements] Re: [office] ODF-Next Requirements

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote on 11/09/2010 11:38:34 AM:
> > What is not obvious to me is whether ODF 1.2 proposals not accepted 
from
> > this list made it into JIRA:
> >
> > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/List_of_Proposals
> 
> All of these issues are in jira, prefixed by "Member proposal: " and I
> believe entered by yourself on Oct 14 2009.  They are all marked
> "fix-for" Odf-next.  Many of these have already been discussed on TC
> calls but missed the deadline and selection process which set out in
> this email from Michael in December 2008.
> 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/
> 200812/msg00091.html
> 
> So whereas it's not given that these member proposals should take
> priority over others for inclusion, they would certainly deserve some
> sort of priority in terms of consideration.
> 
> Anyway, the good part is that they are captured.  It's unfortunate
> that I don't think it's possible to edit the "reported date" in order
> to put them on their rightful chronological place.  But they are easy
> enough to identify to treat as a special set.
> 


OK. Thanks.  I remember thinking that this needed to be done.  But I don't 
remember actually doing it.  Python can have that kind of effect.

-Rob