[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-requirements] Re: [office] ODF-Next Requirements
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote on 11/09/2010 11:38:34 AM: > > What is not obvious to me is whether ODF 1.2 proposals not accepted from > > this list made it into JIRA: > > > > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/List_of_Proposals > > All of these issues are in jira, prefixed by "Member proposal: " and I > believe entered by yourself on Oct 14 2009. They are all marked > "fix-for" Odf-next. Many of these have already been discussed on TC > calls but missed the deadline and selection process which set out in > this email from Michael in December 2008. > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/email/archives/ > 200812/msg00091.html > > So whereas it's not given that these member proposals should take > priority over others for inclusion, they would certainly deserve some > sort of priority in terms of consideration. > > Anyway, the good part is that they are captured. It's unfortunate > that I don't think it's possible to edit the "reported date" in order > to put them on their rightful chronological place. But they are easy > enough to identify to treat as a special set. > OK. Thanks. I remember thinking that this needed to be done. But I don't remember actually doing it. Python can have that kind of effect. -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]