Re: [office] Thoughts on ODF-Next

["Andreas J. Guelzow" <andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca>]

On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 03:59 -0700, Michael Brauer wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> 
> > While I realize that we can't mandate that and in fact have no control
> > over whether a vendor calls their format ODF1.3 or whatever, I thin kwe
> 
> A CSD approval is the first level of approval in the OASIS TC process.
> So, if we approve an ODF 1.3 draft as CSD, and if an implementor 
> implements this CSD, why shouldn't that be called ODF 1.3? How would you 
> call it instead?

Since there can be incompatible changes between CSD1 and CSD2, I
definitely would not call it ODF1.3. 

Andreas
>