[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-3854) [graphic-properties] Proposal: different relative size relations
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=41146#comment-41146 ] Andras Timar commented on OFFICE-3854: -------------------------------------- forwarding a reply from Miklos Vajna: > I would like to sum up here regarding my view on this proposal and the made comments - please correct me, if I misunderstood the one or the other thing: > (a) the proposal is to be able to specify a new area to calculate the relative width and/or height of an anchored object - namely the entire page. Thus, we would have the 'current area' and the 'new area'. Correct. However, the proposal wants to turn this into a list of possibilities that can be extended later if needed -- think of an enum, rather than a boolean; similar to anchoring can be relative to different areas. > (b) the 'new area' is not depending on the object's anchor while the 'current area' is. > (c) the values for the new proposed attributes are 'page' (for the 'new area') and 'paragraph' (for the 'current area') Correct. > (d) the specification for the 'current area' is complex (and be not complete) and the proposed value 'paragraph' seems not reflecting this enough. Fair enough. > (e) the proposal does not include corresponding adjustments to sections 19.509, 19.510.2, 20.331, and 20.332.1 Indeed. > my comments are: > (1) the proposal should also consider attribute style:flow-with-text (section 20.259) as here are given constraints about the size of an object Done, replaced "paragraph" with "layout-environment", and added a reference to 20.259. > (2) the adjustments mentioned above in (e) shall be provided to complete the proposal Done. > (3) regarding above mentioned (d) I think we need to think about a different value which fits better the 'current area'. May be something like 'layout environment' - this term is already used for attribute style:flow-with-text and I think for the 'current area' regarding height it already fits quite well. I have no problem with using "layout-environment" instead of "paragraph" to describe the current situation. > [graphic-properties] Proposal: different relative size relations > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFFICE-3854 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3854 > Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Text > Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 > Environment: This is an enhancement, described in terms of changes to OpenDocument-v1.2 > Reporter: Thorsten Behrens > > Improve interoperability with other text processors, by enabling round-trip of additional graphic style properties. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]