[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-3931) Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time
Regina Henschel created OFFICE-3931: --------------------------------------- Summary: Problems in 20.226 presentation:display-date-time Key: OFFICE-3931 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3931 Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: Presentation Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Reporter: Regina Henschel Priority: Minor Fix For: ODF 1.3 As described in issue 3930, the first sentence needs to be corrected. But in addition I have noticed this: In date-time case the wording is "false: drawing shape from a <style:master-page> element with the presentation class date-time should not be visible." whereas for footer, header and page-number cases it is "false: drawing shape used as a *** of a <style:master-page> element should not be visible. That is inconsistent. ODF 1.1 is more explicit about the condition by referring to the presentation:class attribute (now 19.389). In ODF 1.1 you read e.g. "The presentation:display-date-time attribute sets the visibility of presentation shapes from the master page with the presentation class date-time." Any reason for mentioning presentation:class in case date-time and not in the other cases? Should we remove the inconsistency in addition to correcting the broken sentence? If yes, remove reference to presentation:class from date-time case, or add reference to presentation:class for the other cases? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]