RE: [oic] RE: TestSuite 000001-simplepackage.odt metadata.rdf validity?

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Dang, I was really hoping you could point me to some straightforward
authoritative materials.

I vaguely recall that the approved RDF Metadata proposal had a lot more in
it than the skimpy section in Part 3 about the metadata.rdf files.  (I
already have two JIRA issues on the wrong .owl file being used, but I don't
think the .owl files are enough regardless.)

I looked at the Part 1 draft that is currently under ballot for becoming the
ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD04 Public Review Draft, and it is no more informative than
the Part 3 CD01.

Somehow, in the editorial work to make the current ODF 1.2 drafts, all of
the approved verbiage around RDF Metadata has been removed.  It was pretty
inscrutable, but the replacement is even more so.

 - Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be] 
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 13:03
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: OIC TC List
Subject: [oic] RE: TestSuite 000001-simplepackage.odt metadata.rdf validity?

Hi Dennis,


thanks for checking the file, as you already mentioned, I did make a few
typos.

I used the online odf validator (ODF 1.2 extendend conformance, all logs), 
but probably this doesn't drill down into the details (...yet) since it
lists the doc
as valid / no errors.

I'll remove the RDF part and create a separate test file for that, since it
is a
major new feature. I'm a bit struggling with it, since I did need to check
the
examples from the ODF Metadata SC to see what it is all about...

So this could need some work (or I have some additional homework to do)


Best regards,

Bart

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php