[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OIC-68) S3.1.17-2 and S3.1.17-3,Why have both ?
S3.1.17-2 and S3.1.17-3, Why have both ?
----------------------------------------
Key: OIC-68
URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OIC-68
Project: OASIS Open Document Format Interoperability and Conformance (OIC) TC
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ODF11-InteropProfile
Affects Versions: Committee Draft
Reporter: Dennis Hamilton
Assignee: Bart Hanssens
Priority: Minor
Why have both (S3.1.17-2) and (S3.1.17-3)? There must be a better way to say (S3.1.17-4) and why have days at all? If this is meant to be cumulative, we need to say something more about that too. Days don't strike me as the same as accumulated wall-clock time. If a consumer encounters acceptable values (including no values) that are outside what interoperable producers produce, what is an implementation expected to do on producing an update of the document?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]