Re: [oic] Suggestion of how to define tests for ODF 1.2 - part 1 - ODFSchema

[Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM>]

On 03/02/10 00:09, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:33 -0700, Svante Schubert wrote:
> 
>> The test execution is work that might be delegated to the ODFDOM working 
>> group, I am chairing.
> 
> The ODFDOM seems to be a single implementation. Setting up tests as
> suggested should therefore not delegated to a single implementor's
> working group if interoperability is truly desired.
> 

Only as ODFDOM is using the similar approach and therefore ODFDOM's API 
is nearly identical, it is easy to use automated testing by descriptions.

For all other ODF implementations only the automation part falls apart, 
but still they would have test descriptions with full ODF XML coverage, 
divided into atomic functional units. This much more than anybody else 
has to offer.

Why do you think these test description are not desired from an 
interoperability standpoint, Andreas?

Regards,
Svante