[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oic] Version Control Commit by bart.hanssens - file names ofadvisories
Hi Dennis, > I think there are two separate issues. Indeed > One is not about hiding tracked changes so much as extracting in-line text > (which will exclude tracked changes). It looks like the problem first seen > is related to doing that incorrectly (and a bug in the list of exceptions to > in-line text). That would be the OFFICE-2706, correct ? >This applies to many other situations. Mm, like annotations ? Or other implementations (eg: search engines indexing "removed" text) > Another is about what to do when tracked-changes are not supported and > whether producers that do not support tracked changes should preserve the >text:tracked-changes element and the markers that show up in the character > data of the in-line text. > > It would be valuable to deal with these as a pair, not as one. So should we create a separate Advisory for that ? Or just deal with it in the same Advisory, but make a clear distinction between them ? > I haven't looked closer, but the name change seems to invite treating them > together. Actually I was focusing on the first one ("if you don't support changes, do not render the contents of the text:p and text:h's inside text:tracked-changes as if it was part of the document flow") Best regards, Bart
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]