[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases
Dave Pawson wrote: > 2008/6/23 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>: > >> I don't disagree on the use and applicability of use cases. My concern is >> in having it in the charter. I'd prefer to have use cases as a TC >> deliverable. > > > We want the TC to deliver profiles, based around the use cases > we can suggest. I would like to see that too yes. The TC should be free to write more use-cases of course (and circulate them, together with the ones we write for public review). The TC should also be free to ignore our use-cases where they're not applicable. For example, my two suggested use-cases so far deal with subset profiles. If the TC comes up with a different profiling system, like creating multiple interop profiles based on feature sets (ODF/charts, ODF/tables, ODF/text, etcetera) then my use-cases don't apply. But I'd like the use-cases we write to carry a little more weight than just being merely informative. Is there any middle-ground between the two? E.g. tell the TC that unless public review finds serious flaws in our use-cases they should stick with them? -- Sander Marechal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]